RAS BiologyЗоологический журнал Russian Journal of Zoology

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-5134
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5456

CHANGES IN THE ABUNDANCE OF THE ARCTIC SKUAS (STERCORARIUS PARASITICUS (L., 1758)) AND THE GREAT SKUAS (STERCORARIUS SKUA (BRUNNICH, 1764)) (STERCORARIDAE) ON THE MURMAN ISLANDS AS A RESPONSE TO THE DYNAMICS OF TROPHIC CONDITIONS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN BARENTS SEA

PII
S30345456S0044513425080069-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034545625080069
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 104 / Issue number 8
Pages
79-87
Abstract
Based on the results of long-term monitoring on the Murman Islands, southwestern Barents Sea, the population dynamics of the Arctic skuas (Stercorarius parasiticus) and the Great skuas (S. skua) were determined. Both species were found to have reached their highest numbers at the end of the second decade of the 2000s and, starting with 2018, a rapid decline in the numbers of Arctic skuas was observed (by 71% by 2024), as well as the complete disappearance of Great skuas by 2022 on two of the three Murman archipelagos. The nesting biology of both species in the Murman conditions was studied during observations, mainly of individually tagged individuals. 45 Arctic skuas and 5 Great skuas were tagged. The maximum duration of continuous nesting of the Arctic skua on the Seven Islands archipelago was found to be 10 years; for the Great skua it amounted 5 years. The breeding success in 1991–1995 was 1.6 chicks/pair for the former, and two times lower for the latter. A comparative analysis of the trophic relationships of both species showed that Arctic skuas obtained most of their food as fish and crustaceans through kleptoparasitism on seabirds, while Great skuas preyed on eggs, chicks, and adult seabirds in adjacent areas. The population development crisis of both species in recent decades was established to have been caused by immense deterioration of the trophic conditions in the coastal waters of Murman. The root cause is a change in the oceanographic conditions in the North Atlantic and adjacent seas.
Keywords
короткохвостый поморник большой поморник Баренцево море Мурман численность гнездовая биология трофические условия
Date of publication
10.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
9

References

  1. 1. Белопольский Л.О., 1957. Экология морских колониальных птиц Баренцева моря. М. – Л.: Изд-во АН СССР. 460 с.
  2. 2. Гаврило М.В., Мельников М.В., 2020. Большой поморник Catharacta squa Great Squa – Атлас гнездящихся птиц европейской части России. 2020 / ред.-сост. М.В. Калякин, О.В. Волцит. М.: Фитон XXI. С. 364–366.
  3. 3. Краснов Ю.В., Матишов Г.Г., Галактионов К.В., Савинова Т.Н., 1995. Морские колониальные птицы Мурмана. Санкт-Петербург: Наука. 226 с.
  4. 4. Краснов Ю.В., Николаева Н.Г., 1998. Итоги комплексного изучения биологии моевки в Баренцевом море // Биология и океанография Карского и Баренцева морей (по трассе Севморпути). Апатиты. С. 180–260.
  5. 5. Краснов Ю.В., Ежов А.В., 2020. Состояние популяций морских птиц и факторы, определяющие их развитие в Баренцевом море // Труды Кольского научного центра РАН. Серия Океанология. Вып. 7. Апатиты: Изд-во КНЦ РАН. С. 225–244. https://doi.org/10.37614/2307-5252.2020.11.4.011
  6. 6. Краснов Ю.В., Ежов А.В., 2023. Деструкция колоний кайр в южной части Баренцева моря и определяющие ее факторы // Зоологический журнал. Т. 102. № 5. С. 572–580. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044513423050070
  7. 7. Bemmelen R.S.A. van, Schekkerman H., Hin V., Pot M.T., Janssen K., Ganter B., Rösner H.-U., Tulp I., 2021. Heavy decline оf the largest European Arctic Skua Stercorarius parasiticus colony: interacting effects of food shortage and predation // Bird Study. № 68(1). P. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2021.1969334
  8. 8. Clairbaux M., Mathewson P., Porter W., Fort J., Strøm H.,
  9. 9. Moe B., Fauchald P., Descamps S., Helgason H., Bråthen V.S., Merkel B., Anker-Nilssen T., Bringsvor I.S., Chastel O., Christensen-Dalsgaard S., Danielsen J., Daunt F., Dehnhard N., Erikstad K.E., Ezhov A., Gavrilo M., Krasnov Y., Langset M., Lorentsen S.H., Newell M., Olsen B., Reiertsen T.K., Systad G., Thórarinsson T.L., Baran M., Diamond T.,
  10. 10. Fayet A.L., Fitzsimmons M.G, Frederiksen M., Gilchrist H.G., Guilford T., Huffeldt N.P., Jessopp M., Johansen K.L., Kouwenberg A.L., Linnebjerg J.F., Major H.L., McFarlane Tranquilla L., Mallory M., Merkel F.R., Montevecchi W., Mosbech A., Petersen A.,
  11. 11. Grémillet D., 2021. Report. North Atlantic winter cyclones starve seabirds // Current Biology. № 31. P. 3964–3971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.059
  12. 12. Furness R.W., Camphuysen C.J., 1997. Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES // Journal of Marine Science. V. 54. P. 726–737.
  13. 13. Miles W.T.S., Mavor R., Riddiford N.J., Harvey P.V., Riddington R., Shaw D.N., Parnaby D., Reid J.M., 2015. Decline in an Atlantic puffin population: evaluation of magnitude and mechanisms // PLOS ONE. № 10(7): e0131527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131527
  14. 14. Perkins A., Ratcliffe N., Suddaby D., Ribbands B., Smith C., Ellis P., Meek E., Bolton M., Dunn J., 2018. Combined bottom-up and top-down pressures drive catastrophic population declines of Arctic skuas in Scotland // Journal of Animal Ecology. № 87. P. 1573–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12890
  15. 15. Phillips R.A., Caldow R.W.G., Furness R.W., 1996. The influence of food availability on the breeding effort and reproductive success of Arctic Skuas Stercorarius parasiticus // Ibis. № 138. P. 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb08059.x
  16. 16. Snell K.R.S., Aldarґa J., Hammer S., Thorup K., 2024. Thermal stress during incubation in an Arctic breeding seabird // Journal of Thermal Biology. № 125(1): 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103967
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library